References
Amrhein, Valentin, David Trafimow & Sander Greenland. 2019.
Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: There is no
replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. The
American Statistician 73(sup1). 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137.
Arif, Suchinta & M. Aaron MacNeil. 2022. Predictive models aren’t
for causal inference. Ecology Letters 25(8). 1741–1745. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14033.
Betancourt, Michael. 2018. Calibrating model-based inferences and
decisions. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.08393.
Bezeau, Scott & Roger Graves. 2001. Statistical power and effect
sizes of clinical neuropsychology research. Journal of Clinical and
Experimental Neuropsychology 23(3). 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.3.399.1181.
Bochynska, Agata, Liam Keeble, Caitlin Halfacre, Joseph V. Casillas,
Irys-Amélie Champagne, Kaidi Chen, Melanie Röthlisberger, Erin M.
Buchanan & Timo B. Roettger. 2023. Reproducible research practices
and transparency across linguistics. Glossa Psycholinguistics
2(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011239.
Brentari, Diane, Susan Goldin-Meadow, Laura Horton, Ann Senghas &
Marie Coppola. 2024. The organization of verb meaning in Lengua de Señas Nicaragüense (LSN): Sequential or
simultaneous structures? Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics 9(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10342.
Brugger, Peter. 2001. From haunted brain to haunted science: A cognitive
neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought.
Hauntings and Poltergeists: Multidisciplinary Perspectives
195213.
Brysbaert, Marc. 2020. Power considerations in bilingualism research:
Time to step up our game. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
24(5). 813818. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728920000437.
Brysbaert, Marc & Michaël Stevens. 2018. Power analysis and effect
size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition
1(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10.
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2017. Brms: An R package for
Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of
Statistical Software 80(1). 128. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2018. Advanced Bayesian multilevel
modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal
10(1). 395411. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017.
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2024. Estimating multivariate models with brms.
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/vignettes/brms_multivariate.html.
Bürkner, Paul-Christian & Matti Vuorre. 2019. Ordinal regression
models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices
in Psychological Science 2(1). 77101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Nivedita Malik, Circle Steele, Stefano Coretta,
Ludovica Serratrice & Elena Lieven. 2020. A cross-cultural analysis
of early prelinguistic gesture development and its relationship to
language development. Child Development 92(1). 273290. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13406.
Casillas, Joseph V., Gabriela Constantin-Dureci, Iván Andreu Rascón,
Jiawei Shao, Stephanie A. Rodríguez, Adrija Gadamsetty, Alexandria
Minetti, et al. 2025. Opening open science to all: Demystifying
reproducibility and transparency practices in linguistic research.
Linguistics. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/ling-2023-0249.
Cassidy, Scott A., Ralitza Dimova, Benjamin Giguère, Jeffrey R. Spence
& David J. Stanley. 2019. Failing grade: 89 per-cent of introduction
to psychology textbooks that define/explain statistical significance do
so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological
Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072.
Castanelli, Damian. 2024. Developing your philosophical stance as a
PhD student: A case study. Focus on Health Professional
Education: A Multi-Professional Journal 25(2). 130–143. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i2.831.
Chambers, Christopher D., Zoltan Dienes, Robert D. McIntosh, Pia
Rotshtein & Klaus Willmes. 2015. Registered reports: Realigning
incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex 66. A1A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022.
Charles, Sarah J., James E. Bartlett, Kyle J. Messick, Thomas J. Coleman
& Alex Uzdavines. 2019. Researcher degrees of freedom in the
psychology of religion. The International Journal for the Psychology
of Religion 29(4). 230245.
Claesen, Aline, Sara Gomes, Francis Tuerlinckx & Wolf Vanpaemel.
2021. Comparing dream to reality: An assessment of adherence of the
first generation of preregistered studies. Royal Society Open
Science 8(10). 211037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211037.
Cohen, Jacob. 1962. The statistical power of abnormal-social
psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology 65(3). 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186.
Coretta, Stefano. 2018. An exploratory study of the voicing effect in
Italian and Polish. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XQ8K3.
Coretta, Stefano. 2019b. Vowel duration, voicing duration, and vowel
height: Acoustic and articulatory data from Italian
[research compendium]. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XDGFZ.
Coretta, Stefano. 2019a. An exploratory study of voicing-related
differences in vowel duration as compensatory temporal adjustment in
Italian and Polish. Glossa: a journal of
general linguistics 4(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.869.
Coretta, Stefano. 2020b. Open science in phonetics and phonology. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4dz5t.
Coretta, Stefano. 2020c. Longer vowel duration correlates with greater
tongue root advancement at vowel offset: Acoustic and articulatory data
from Italian and Polish. The Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America 147. 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000556.
Coretta, Stefano. 2020a. Vowel duration and consonant voicing: A
production study. The University of Manchester PhD thesis.
Coretta, Stefano. 2022. Bayesian CrI-width power analysis.
https://stefanocoretta.github.io/posts/2022-04-05-bayesian-ci-width-power-analysis/.
Coretta, Stefano & Paul-Christian Bürkner. 2025. Bayesian beta
regressions with brms in R: A tutorial for phoneticians. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/f9rqg_v1.
Coretta, Stefano, Joseph V. Casillas, Simon Roessig, Michael Franke,
Byron Ahn, Ali H. Al-Hoorie, Jalal Al-Tamimi, et al. 2023.
Multidimensional signals and analytic flexibility: Estimating degrees of
freedom in human-speech analyses. Advances in Methods and Practices
in Psychological Science 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231162567.
Coretta, Stefano, Josiane Riverin-Coutlée, Enkeleida Kapia & Stephen
Nichols. 2022. Northern tosk albanian. Journal of the International
Phonetic Association 123. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100322000044.
Crüwell, Sophia, Johnny van Doorn, Alexander Etz, Matthew C. Makel,
Hannah Moshontz, Jesse Niebaum, Amy Orben, Sam Parsons & Michael
Schulte-Mecklenbeck. 2019. Seven easy steps to open science: An
annotated reading list. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 227(4).
237248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387.
Cumming, Geoff. 2013. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological
Science 25(1). 729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966.
Darwin Holmes, Andrew Gary. 2020. Researcher positionality: A
consideration of its influence and place in qualitative
researcha new researcher guide. Shanlax International
Journal of Education 8(4). 110. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232.
DeBruine, Lisa M. & Dale J. Barr. 2021. Understanding mixed-effects
models through data simulation. Advances in Methods and Practices in
Psychological Science 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920965119.
Devezer, Berna, Luis G Nardin, Bert Baumgaertner & Erkan Ozge
Buzbas. 2019. Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework:
Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity. PloS one
14(5). e0216125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216125.
Devezer, Berna, Danielle J. Navarro, Joachim Vandekerckhove & Erkan
Ozge Buzbas. 2021. The case for formal methodology in scientific reform.
Royal Society Open Science 8(3). rsos.200805, 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805.
Dienes, Zoltan. 2008. Understanding psychology as a science: An
introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan
International Higher Education.
Dobreva, Simona. 2024. Bayesian vs frequentist approach: Same data,
opposite results. https://365datascience.com/trending/bayesian-vs-frequentist-approach/.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2008. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and
basic linguistic theory. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Charles Dench &
Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of
grammar writing (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs),
vol. 167. Mouton De Gruyter.
Egurtzegi, Ander & Christopher Carignan. 2020. An acoustic
description of mixean basque. The Journal of the Acoustical Society
of America 147(4). 27912802. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000996.
Ellis, J. Timothy & Yair Levy. 2008. Framework of problem-based
research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a
research-worthy problem. Informing Science: The International
Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 11. 1733. https://doi.org/10.28945/438.
Fanelli, Daniele. 2010. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’
bias? An empirical support from US states data. (Ed.) Enrico Scalas.
PLoS ONE 5(4). e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.
Fanelli, Daniele. 2012. Negative results are disappearing from most
disciplines and countries. Scientometrics 90(3). 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7.
Fanelli, Daniele, Rodrigo Costas & John P. A. Ioannidis. 2017.
Meta-assessment of bias in science. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 114(14). 3714–3719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618569114.
Farsani, Mohammad Amini & A. Mehdi Riazi. 2025. Exploring
questionable research practices in applied linguistics mixed methods
research studies. Journal of Second Language Studies 8(2).
344–374. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00051.far.
Fischhoff, Baruch. 1975. Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect
of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance 1(3).
288.
Flake, Jessica Kay & Eiko I. Fried. 2020. Measurement
schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid
them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological
Science 3(4). 456465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393.
Franke, Michael. 2025. Bayesian regression: Theory &
practice. https://michael-franke.github.io/Bayesian-Regression/.
Frankenhuis, Willem E., Karthik Panchanathan & Paul E. Smaldino.
2023. Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences. Social
Psychological Bulletin 18. e9923. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.9923.
Gaeta, Laura & Christopher R. Brydges. 2020. An examination of
effect sizes and statistical power in speech, language, and hearing
research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
63(5). 15721580. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00299.
Galton, Francis. 1886. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary
stature. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great
Britain and Ireland 15. 246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2841583.
Galton, Francis. 1980. Kinship and correlation. The North American
Review 150(401). 419431.
Gelman, Andrew. 2005. Analysis of variance: Why it is more important
than ever. The Annals of Statistics 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000001048.
Gelman, Andrew & Christian Hennig. 2017. Beyond subjective and
objective in statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:
Series A (Statistics in Society) 180(4). 9671033. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12276.
Gelman, Andrew, Daniel Lakeland, Brian Haig, Christian Hennig, Art Owen,
Robert Cousins, Stan Young, et al. 2019. Many perspectives on deborah
mayo’s “statistical inference as severe testing: How to get
beyond the statistics wars”. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.08876.
Gelman, Andrew & Eric Loken. 2014. The statistical crisis in
science: Data-dependent analysis. A “garden of forking
paths”explains why many statistically
significant comparisons don’t hold up. American scientist
102(6). 460466.
Gelman, Andrew, Deborah Ann Nolan & Deborah Ann Nolan. 2011.
Teaching statistics: a bag of tricks. Repr. Oxford: Oxford
Univ. Press.
Gelman, Andrew & Hal Stern. 2006. The difference between
“significant” and “not
significant” is not itself statistically significant.
The American Statistician 60(4). 328331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649.
Gelman, Andrew, Aki Vehtari, Richard McElreath, Daniel Simpson, Charles
C. Margossian, Yuling Yao, Lauren Kennedy, et al. 2026. Bayesian
workflow. Boca Raton, FL Abingdon, Oxon: CRC Press.
Gelman, Andrew, Aki Vehtari, Daniel Simpson, Charles C. Margossian, Bob
Carpenter, Yuling Yao, Lauren Kennedy, Jonah Gabry, Paul-Christian
Bürkner & Martin Modrák. 2020. Bayesian workflow. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2011.01808.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2004. Mindless statistics. The Journal of
Socio-Economics 33(5). 587606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2018. Statistical rituals: The replication delusion
and how we got there. Advances in Methods and Practices in
Psychological Science 1(2). 198218. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771329.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Stefan Krauss & Oliver Vitouch. 2004. The null
ritual. What you always wanted to know about significance
testing but were afraid to ask. In, 391408.
Green, Peter & Catriona J. MacLeod. 2016. Simr: An R
package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by
simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(4). 493498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504.
Halpern, Jerry, Byron Wm. Brown & John Hornberger. 2001. The sample
size for a clinical trial: A Bayesiandecision
theoretic approach. Statistics in Medicine 20(6). 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.703.
Haven, Tamarinde L. & Dr. Leonie Van Grootel. 2019. Preregistering
qualitative research. Accountability in Research 26(3).
229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147.
Heiss, Andrew. 2021. A guide to modeling proportions with bayesian beta
and zero-inflated beta regression models. https://www.andrewheiss.com/blog/2021/11/08/beta-regression-guide.
Holtz, Yan. 2019. The issue with error bars. https://www.data-to-viz.com/caveat/error_bar.html.
Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005. Why most published research findings are
false. PLoS Medicine 2(8). e124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2019.1579573.
Jafar, Anisa J. N. 2018. What is positionality and should it be
expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal.
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158.
John, Leslie K., George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec. 2012. Measuring
the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for
truth telling. Psychological science 23(5). 524532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953.
Karhulahti, Veli-Matti. 2022. Registered reports for qualitative
research. Nature Human Behaviour 6(1). 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01265-8.
Karhulahti, Veli-Matti, Peter Branney, Miia Siutila & Moin Syed.
2023. A primer for choosing, designing and evaluating registered reports
for qualitative methods. Open Research Europe 3. 22. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15532.2.
Kassambara, Alboukadel. 2017b. Practical guide to principal
component methods in R. STHDA.
Kassambara, Alboukadel. 2017a. Practical guide to cluster analysis
in R. STHDA.
Kavanagh, Christopher Michael & Rohan Kapitány. Promoting the
benefits and clarifying misconceptions about preregistration, preprints,
and open science for cognitive science of religion. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e9zs8.
Kerr, Norbert L. 1998. HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are
known. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(3). 196217.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4.
Kirby, James & Morgan Sonderegger. 2018. Mixed-effects design
analysis for experimental phonetics. Journal of Phonetics 70.
7085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.05.005.
Kobrock, Kristina & Timo B. Roettger. 2023. Assessing the
replication landscape in experimental linguistics. Glossa
Psycholinguistics 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011135.
Koole, Sander L & Daniël Lakens. 2012. Rewarding replications: A
sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives
on Psychological Science 7(6). 608614.
Kruschke, John K. & Torrin M. Liddell. 2018. The bayesian new
statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power
analysis from a bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review 25(1). 178206. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.
Kurtz, Solomon. 2023. Statistical rethinking with brms, ggplot2, and
the tidyverse: Second edition. version 0.4.0. https://bookdown.org/content/4857/.
Lakens, Daniël. 2021. Sample size justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf.
Lakens, Daniël, Cristian Mesquida, Sajedeh Rasti & Massimiliano
Ditroilo. 2024. The benefits of preregistration and registered reports.
Evidence-Based Toxicology 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2833373x.2024.2376046.
Lewer, Dan, Thomas Brothers, Elizabeth O’Nions & John Pickavance.
2025. Factors associated with: Problems of using exploratory
multivariable regression to identify causal risk factors. BMJ
Medicine 4(1). e001375. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001375.
Liu, Meng, Yuan Sang, Phil Hiver & Ali H. Al-Hoorie. 2025. The
Ulysses pact: An emic perspective on registered reports in
applied linguistics. Journal of Second Language Studies 8(2).
192–218. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00045.liu.
Lorson, Alexandra, Chris Cummins & Hannah Rohde. 2021. Strategic use
of (un)certainty expressions. Frontiers in Communication 6.
635156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.635156.
Makel, Matthew C., Jonathan A. Plucker & Boyd Hegarty. 2012.
Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur?
Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6). 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460688.
Mayo, Deborah G. 2018. Statistical inference as severe testing: How
to get beyond the statistics wars. 1st edn. Cambridge University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107286184.
McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical rethinking: A
Bayesian course with examples in R and
Stan (Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical
Science Series). Second edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Mikkola, Petrus, Osvaldo A. Martin, Suyog Chandramouli, Marcelo
Hartmann, Oriol Abril Pla, Owen Thomas, Henri Pesonen, et al. 2024.
Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and future. Bayesian
Analysis 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1214/23-BA1381.
Morin, Olivier. 2015. A plea for
“shmeasurement” in the social sciences.
Biological Theory 10(3). 237245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0217-z.
Munafò, Marcus R., Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V. M. Bishop, Katherine S.
Button, Christopher D. Chambers, Nathalie Percie Du Sert, Uri Simonsohn,
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J. Ware & John P. A. Ioannidis. 2017.
A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour
1(1). 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
Nalborczyk, Ladislas, Cédric Batailler, Hélène Loevenbruck, Anne Vilain
& Paul-Christian Bürkner. 2019. An introduction to
Bayesian multilevel models using brms: A case study of
gender effects on vowel variability in standard indonesian. Journal
of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0006.
Nicenboim, Bruno, Daniel J. Schad & Shravan Vasishth. 2025.
Introduction to Bayesian data analysis for cognitive
science. https://bruno.nicenboim.me/bayescogsci/.
Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon
in many guises. Review of general psychology 2(2). 175220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
Nissen, Silas Boye, Tali Magidson, Kevin Gross & Carl T. Bergstrom.
2016. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
Elife 5. e21451. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21451.
Nosek, Brian A & Daniël Lakens. 2014. A method to increase the
credibility of published results. Social Psychology 45(3).
137141.
Okasha, Samir. 2016. Philosophy of science: Very short
introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802835.001.0001.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of
psychological science. Science 349(6251). aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
Pankratz, Elizabeth & Bob Van Tiel. 2021. The role of relevance for
scalar diversity: A usage-based approach. Language and
Cognition 13(4). 562–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.13.
Pashler, Harold & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. 2012. Editors’ introduction
to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A
crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science
7(6). 528530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253.
Pedersen, Eric J., David L. Miller, Gavin L. Simpson & Noam Ross.
2019. Hierarchical generalized additive models in ecology: An
introduction with mgcv. PeerJ 7. e6876. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6876.
Perezgonzalez, Jose D. 2015. Fisher,
Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A
tutorial for teaching data testing. Frontiers in Psychology
6(223). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223.
R Core Team. 2025. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing [version 4.5.0].
Roettger, Timo B. 2019. Researcher degrees of freedom in phonetic
sciences. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for
Laboratory Phonology 10(1). 127.
Roettger, Timo B. 2021. Preregistration in experimental linguistics:
Applications, challenges, and limitations. Linguistics 59(5).
12271249. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0048.
Roettger, Timo B., Bodo Winter & Harald Baayen. 2019. Emergent data
analysis in phonetic sciences: Towards pluralism and reproducibility.
Journal of Phonetics 73. 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.001.
Rohrer, Julia M. 2018. Thinking clearly about correlations and
causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances
in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1(1). 2742. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629.
Rosenberg, Alexander & Lee Mclntyre. 2020. Philosophy of
science: a contemporary introduction (Routledge contemporary
introductions to philosophy). Fourth edition. New York London:
Routledge.
Schad, Daniel J., Michael Betancourt & Shravan Vasishth. 2021.
Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science.
Psychological Methods 26(1). 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000275.
Scheel, Anne M. 2022. Why most psychological research findings are not
even wrong. Infant and Child Development 31(1). e2295. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2295.
Scheel, Anne M., Leonid Tiokhin, Peder M. Isager & Daniël Lakens.
2020. Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses.
Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(4). 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795.
Schooler, Jonathan W. 2014. Metascience could rescue the
“replication crisis.” Nature News 515(7525). 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/515009a.
Sedlmeier, Peter & Gerd Gigerenzer. 1992. Do studies of statistical
power have an effect on the power of studies? In, 389–406. Washington:
American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10109-032.
Silberzahn, Raphael, Eric L. Uhlmann, Daniel P. Martin, Pasquale
Anselmi, Frederik Aust, Eli Awtrey, Štěpán Bahník, Feng Bai, Colin
Bannard & Evelina Bonnier. 2018. Many analysts, one data set: Making
transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
1(3). 337356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646.
Simmons, Joseph P, Leif D Nelson & Uri Simonsohn. 2011.
False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection
and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
Psychological science 22(11). 13591366.
Simpson, Gavin L. 2018. Fitting GAMs with brms: Part 1. https://fromthebottomoftheheap.net/2018/04/21/fitting-gams-with-brms/.
Slow Science Academy. 2010. The slow science manifesto. http://slow-science.org.
Song, Yoonsang, Youngah Do, Arthur L. Thompson, Eileen R. Waegemaekers
& Jongbong Lee. 2020. Second language users exhibit shallow
morphological processing. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition 42(5). 11211136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263120000170.
Sóskuthy, Márton. 2021. Evaluating generalised additive mixed modelling
strategies for dynamic speech analysis. Journal of Phonetics
84. 101017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.101017.
Sóskuthy, Márton. Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis
in linguistics: A practical introduction. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05339.
Stan Development Team. 2025. Prior choice recommendations. https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/wiki/Prior-Choice-Recommendations.
Starns, Jeffrey J., Andrea M. Cataldo, Caren M.
Rotello, Jeffrey Annis, Andrew Aschenbrenner, Arndt Bröder, Gregory Cox,
et al. 2019. Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded
inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. Advances in
Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2(4). 335349. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919869583.
Sterling, Theodore D. 1959. Publication decisions and their possible
effects on inferences drawn from tests of significanceor
vice versa. Journal of the American statistical association
54(285). 3034.
Student. 1908. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6(1).
1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331554.
Tucker, Benjamin V, Daniel Brenner, Kyle Danielson D, Matthew C Kelley,
Filip Nenadić & Michelle Sims. 2019. The massive auditory lexical
decision (MALD) database. Behavior Research Methods 51(3).
11871204. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1056-1.
Tukey, John W. 1969. Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work?
American Psychologist 24(2). 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027108.
Tukey, John W. 1980. We need both exploratory and confirmatory. The
American Statistician 34(1). 23–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2682991.
Tversky, Amos & Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty:
Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of
thinking under uncertainty. Science 185(4157). 11241131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Vasishth, Shravan & Andrew Gelman. 2021. How to embrace variation
and accept uncertainty in linguistic and psycholinguistic data analysis.
Linguistics 59(5). 13111342. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0051.
Veenman, Myrthe, Angelika M. Stefan & Julia M. Haaf. 2023. Bayesian
hierarchical modeling: An introduction and reassessment. Behavior
Research Methods 56(5). 4600–4631. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02204-3.
Verissimo, Joao. 2021. Analysis of rating scales: A pervasive problem in
bilingualism research and a solution with Bayesian ordinal
models. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24(5). 842848. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000316.
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Ruud Wetzels, Denny Borsboom, Han L. J. van der
Maas & Rogier A. Kievit. 2012. An agenda for purely confirmatory
research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6). 632638.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078.
Wicherts, Jelte M., Denny Borsboom, Judith Kats & Dylan Molenaar.
2006. The poor availability of psychological research data for
reanalysis. American psychologist 61(7). 726.
Wicherts, Jelte M., Coosje L. S. Veldkamp, Hilde E. M. Augusteijn,
Marjan Bakker, Robbie C. M. van Aert & Marcel A. L. M. van Assen.
2016. Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting
psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in
Psychology 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832.
Wickham, Hadley, Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel & Garrett Grolemund. 2023.
R for data science (2e). Second edition. https://r4ds.hadley.nz.
Wieling, Martijn. 2018. Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using
generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory
differences between L1 and L2 speakers of
English. Journal of Phonetics 70. 86116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002.
Wilke, Claus. 2019. Fundamentals of data visualization. https://clauswilke.com/dataviz/.
Winter, Bodo. 2013. Linear models and linear mixed effects models in
R with linguistic applications.
Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for linguists: An introduction using
R. Routledge.
Winter, Bodo & Paul-Christian Bürkner. 2021. Poisson regression for
linguists: A tutorial introduction to modelling count data with brms.
Language and Linguistics Compass 15(11). e12439. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12439.
Winter, Bodo & Sven Grawunder. 2012. The phonetic profile of korean
formal and informal speech registers. Journal of Phonetics
40(6). 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006.
Yarkoni, Tal. 2022. The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and
Brain Sciences 45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x20001685.