Vowel-to-vowel isochrony is sensitive to syllabic and foot structure

Stefano Coretta

University of Edinburgh

October 30, 2025

Vowel-to-vowel isochrony

Temporal lag between two consecutive vowels is an isochronous unit of speech.

C-centre hypothesis

About the temporal organisation of gestures in relation to syllabic structure.

Voicing effect and isochrony

Voicing effect as temporal trade-off between vowel and consonant (compensatory adjustment).

  • Italian, Polish, English disyllabic words (Coretta 2019a, 2020, 2019b).
  • Release-to-release temporal stability.

Syllabic structure

Syllabic structure: Italian

  • Celata and Mairano (2014); Celata, Meluzzi, and Bertini (2018); Celata, Meluzzi, and Bertini (2022). Singleton/geminate, tauto- heterosyllabic clusters, but no singleton/tauto comparison?

  • Italian as a test case:

    • ✅ Isocrony → tata ~ tatra

    • ❌ tata ~ tatta

    • ❌ tatta ~ tanta

    • ❌ tatta ~ tattra

    • ❌ tanta ~ tantra

Foot structure

  • Goldsmith (1990), Hayes (1995), Liberman and Mattingly (1985) : metrical models of segmental organisation.

  • Tilsen (2013), Tilsen (2016): hierarchical selection and coordination of speech. Also see Turk and Shattuck-Hufnagel (2020), Elie, Lee, and Turk (2023), Elie, Simko, and Turk (2024), Elie, Šimko, and Turk (2024).

  • English:

    • Hayes (1982), Hammond (2003), Jensen (2022): organisation of English foot.

    • Davis and Summers (1989) look at atop/adopt and anti-petting/anti-betting. Inconclusive: possibly no vowel duration difference?

Foot structure: English

  • ✅ VV isochrony in atony/atrophy.

  • ❌ petition/patrician.

Foot structure: English

  • Blaskovics (2025): preliminary findings from articulatory data.

Vowel-to-vowel time lag in within/across feet context and voiceless/voiced consonants (from Blaskovics (2025)).

Summary

  • Vowel-to-vowel isochrony is worth investigating (irrespective of traditional rhythmic types).

  • I proposed that vowel-to-vowel isochrony is disrupted by:

    • Syllabic structure: codas.

    • Foot structure: across feet.

  • Further data needed.

References

Abercrombie, David. 1965. Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
———. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Blaskovics, Ákos. 2025. “Vowel-to-Vowel Isochrony Across Different Suprasegmental and Intervocalic Configurations.” PhD thesis, Edinburgh, UK.
Browman, Catherine P., and Louis Goldstein. 1988. “Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology.” Phonetica 45 (2-4): 140155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261823.
———. 2000. “Competing Constraints on Intergestural Coordination and Self-Organization of Phonological Structures.” Bulletin de La Communication Parlée, no. 5: 2534.
Browman, Catherine P., and Louis M. Goldstein. 1986. “Towards an Articulatory Phonology.” Phonology Yearbook 3: 219252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000658.
Celata, Chiara, and Paolo Mairano. 2014. “On the Timing of v-to-v Intervals in Italian: A Review, and Some New Hypotheses.” Revista de Filología Románica 31: 37.
Celata, Chiara, Chiara Meluzzi, and Chiara Bertini. 2018. “Stressed Vowel Durational Variations and Articulatory Cohesiveness: Italian Data.”
———. 2022. “Acoustic and Kinematic Correlates of Heterosyllabicity in Different Phonological Contexts.” Language and Speech 65 (3): 755–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211065789.
Coretta, Stefano. 2019a. “An Exploratory Study of Voicing-Related Differences in Vowel Duration as Compensatory Temporal Adjustment in Italian and Polish.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 125. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.869.
———. 2019b. “Temporal (in)stability in English Monosyllabic and Disyllabic Words: Insights on the Effect of Voicing on Vowel Duration.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/jvwa8.
———. 2020. “Longer Vowel Duration Correlates with Greater Tongue Root Advancement at Vowel Offset: Acoustic and Articulatory Data from Italian and Polish.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147: 245259. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000556.
Davis, Stuart, and W. Van Summers. 1989. “Vowel Length and Closure Duration in Word-Medial VC Sequences.” Journal of Phonetics 17: 339353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30449-8.
Elie, Benjamin, David N. Lee, and Alice Turk. 2023. “Modeling Trajectories of Human Speech Articulators Using General Tau Theory.” Speech Communication 151: 2438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2023.04.004.
Elie, Benjamin, Juraj Simko, and Alice Turk. 2024. “Interspeech 2024.” In, 3610–14. ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2024-822.
Elie, Benjamin, Juraj Šimko, and Alice Turk. 2024. “Optimization-Based Planning of Speech Articulation Using General Tau Theory.” Speech Communication 160: 103083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2024.103083.
Fowler, Carol A. 1980. “Coarticulation and Theories of Extrinsic Timing.” Journal of Phonetics 8 (1): 113133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31446-9.
———. 1983. “Converging Sources of Evidence on Spoken and Perceived Rhythms of Speech: Cyclic Production of Vowels in Monosyllabic Stress Feet.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112 (3): 386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.112.3.386.
———. 1992. “Vowel Duration and Closure Duration in Voiced and Unvoiced Stops: There Are No Contrast Effects Here.” Journal of Phonetics 20 (1): 143165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30244-X.
Goldsmith, John A. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goldstein, Louis, Dani Byrd, and Elliot Saltzman. 2006. “The Role of Vocal Tract Gestural Action Units in Understanding the Evolution of Phonology.” In, edited by Michael A. Arbib, 215249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541599.008.
Goldstein, Louis, and Marianne Pouplier. 2014. “The Temporal Organization of Speech.” In, edited by V. Ferreira, M. Goldrick, and M. Miozzo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hammond, Michael. 2003. The phonology of English: a prosodic optimality-theoretic approach. Repr. The phonology of the world’s languages. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Hayes, Bruce. 1982. “Extrametricality and English Stress.” Linguistic Inquiry 13 (2): 227–76.
———. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.
Jensen, John T. 2022. The Lexical and Metrical Phonology of English: The Legacy of the Sound Pattern of English. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108889131.
Liberman, Alvin M., and Ignatius G. Mattingly. 1985. “The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised.” Cognition 21 (1): 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6.
Liu, Sha, and Kaye Takeda. 2021. “Mora-Timed, Stress-Timed, and Syllable-Timed Rhythm Classes: Clues in English Speech Production by Bilingual Speakers.” Acta Linguistica Academica, September. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2021.00469.
Öhman, Sven E. G. 1966. “Coarticulation in Vcv Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39 (1): 151168. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1909864.
———. 1967a. “Numerical Model of Coarticulation.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 41 (2): 310320. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1910340.
———. 1967b. “Peripheral Motor Commands in Labial Articulation.” Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Status Report 8: 3063.
Pike, Kenneth L. 1945. “The Intonation of American English.” In, edited by Dwight Bolinger, 5383. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Ramus, Franck, Marina Nespor, and Jacques Mehler. 1999. “Correlates of Linguistic Rhythm in the Speech Signal.” Cognition 73 (3): 265–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X.
Tilsen, Sam. 2013. “A Dynamical Model of Hierarchical Selection and Coordination in Speech Planning.” PLoS ONE 8 (4): e62800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062800.
———. 2016. “Selection and Coordination: The Articulatory Basis for the Emergence of Phonological Structure.” Journal of Phonetics 55: 5377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.005.
Turk, Alice, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2020. Speech Timing: Implications for Theories of Phonology, Phonetics, and Speech Motor Control. Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

But not acoustics…

  • Blaskovics (2025): very different patters from acoustic data.

Vowel-to-vowel acoustic time lag in within/across feet context and voiceless/voiced consonants (from Blaskovics (2025)).