class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide # The more we learn the less we know ## (Un)resolved questions on the voicing effect ### Stefano Coretta ### Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing, LMU Munich ### 28th July 2021, PhoPho Colloquium at the University of Potsdam --- class: center middle # ~ Voicing effect ~ ![](img/voicing-effect.png) --- # What is "voicing"? .center[ ![:scale 70%](img/voicing.png) ] --- # Voicing as a physical property .pull-left[ .center.f1.small-caps.bg-washed-green.ba.bw2.br3.b--dark-green[acoustic] .center[Periodicity in the speech signal.] ![](img/periodic-waveform.png) ] .pull-right[ .center.f1.small-caps.bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3[articulatory] .center[Cyclic vibration of the vocal folds.] <br> ![](img/thomas2016-vocal-folds.jpg) .f6.pull-right[CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 James Thomas] ] --- # Voicing as a lexical contrast .f6[(Haspelmath 2010, 2015, 2020, 2021)] .pull-left[ .center.f3.small-caps[language-particular category] <br> .pull-left[ **Northern Italian** - /t/ = [t] - /d/ = [d] **Spanish** - /t/ = [t] - /d/ = [d], [ð], [θ] ] .pull-right[ **Mawayana** .f6[(Coretta 2013)] - /t/ = [t] - /ɗ/ = [ɗ], [d̰], [d] **Nalögo** .f6[(Alfarano 2021)] - /t/ = [t], [tʰ], [ɾ] - /d/ = [ⁿd], [d] ] ] -- .pull-right[ .center.f3.small-caps[comparative concept] <br> .bg-washed-green.bw2.br3.center[ .f1.small-caps[voicing] ] <br> .f2.center.small-caps[voiceless ~ voiced] ] -- .pull-right[ VE in **whispered** speech and in **word-final-devoicing** languages. ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- class: center middle inverse <iframe src="https://wall.sli.do/event/bhuf7xqj" width="1000" height="600" style="border:none;"></iframe> ??? https://app.sli.do/event/bhuf7xqj <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Myths <br> .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 1**. The voicing effect is a very common phenomenon. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 2**. Polish and Czech do not show a voicing effect. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 3**. The magnitude of the voicing effect in English is greater than that of other languages. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 4**. The voicing effect is modulated by phonological contexts in systematic ways. ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- class: middle # How common is the voicing effect?
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Myths <br> .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 1**. The voicing effect is a very common phenomenon. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 2**. Polish and Czech do not show a voicing effect. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 3**. The magnitude of the voicing effect in English is greater than that of other languages. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 4**. The voicing effect is modulated by phonological contexts in systematic ways. ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Polish and Czech: do they or do they not? <br> | | Absence of a VE | Presence of a VE | |:-----------|:------------------------|:----------------------------| | **Polish** | Jassem & Richter (1989) | Slowiaczek & Dinnsen (1985) | | | Keating (1984) | Nowak (2006) | | | Strycharczuk (2012) | Malisz & Klessa (2008) | | | | Coretta (2019) | | | | | | **Czech** | Keating (1984a) | Machač & Skarnitzl (2007) | <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Myths <br> .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 1**. The voicing effect is a very common phenomenon. ] .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 2**. Polish and Czech do not show a voicing effect. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 3**. The magnitude of the voicing effect in English is greater than that of other languages. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 4**. The voicing effect is modulated by phonological contexts in systematic ways. ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Cross-linguistic differences .center[![](img/some-more-comparative.jpg)] --- # Direct comparative studies .f2[ - **Chen 1970** - English, French, Russian, Korean - **Mack 1982** - English, French, English/French bilinguals - **Laeufer 1992** - English and French. - **Tanner et al. 2019** - Varieties of English. - **Coretta in progress** - English, Italian, Polish. ] --- class: center middle ![:scale 80%](img/mar-eff-by-lang.png) <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- class: middle > .f1[The voicing effect is phonologised in English.] <br> .pull-right.f3[— de Jong 1991, de Jong 2004, Solé, Beddor & Ohala 2007, Sanker 2019, ...] --- # Phonologisation .panelset[ .panel[.panel-name[Structuralism] .pull-left[ .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt5[ Phonologisation is the creation of a new phonemic contrast, or in other words when a contextual allophone becomes *contrastive* (i.e. a phoneme). ] .tr[ — Kiparsky 2015 ] ] .pull-right[ ![](img/phonologisation-structuralist.png) ] ] .panel[.panel-name[Lexical Ph] .bg-washed-blue.b--dark-blue.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt5[ A process is phonologised when it goes from being applied post-lexically to being applied lexically. ] .tr[ — Kiparsky 1988 ] ] .panel[.panel-name[Stratal OT] .pull-left[ .bg-washed-yellow.b--gold.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt5[ Phonologisation occurs when the constraint ordering of the (post-lexical) phrasal domain is copied over onto the (lexical) word and stem domains. ] .tr[ — Kiparsky 2000, Bermúdez-Otero 2017 ] ] .pull-right[ ![](img/phonologisation-stratal-ot.png) ] ] .panel[.panel-name[Life Cycle] .pull-left[ .bg-near-white.b--purple.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt5[ Phonologisation occurs when a physio-anatomical ("mechanic") phenomenon comes under the control of the speaker/hearer and becomes part of their grammar (more specifically, part of the *phonetic module* of the grammar). ] .tr[ — Bermúdez-Otero 2007, Bermúdez-Otero 2015 ] ] .pull-right[ ![](img/bermudez-otero-trousdale-2012.png) ] ] .panel[.panel-name[Exemplar-based] .pull-left[ .bg-washed-yellow.b--orange.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt5[ Every type of sound variation/alternation is "phonologised" (i.e. neuro-cognitive permanence) as soon as it is experienced by the speaker/hearer *and* stored in memory. ] .tr[ — Johnson 1997, Sóskuthy et al. 2018, Ambridge 2018, Todd et al. 2019 ] ] .pull-right[ ![](img/soskuthy2013-183.png) — Sóskuthy 2013:183 ] ] ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Myths <br> .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 1**. The voicing effect is a very common phenomenon. ] .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 2**. Polish and Czech do not show a voicing effect. ] .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 3**. The magnitude of the voicing effect in English is greater than that of other languages. ] .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 4**. The voicing effect is modulated by phonological contexts in systematic ways. ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Contextual effects (in English) .pull-left[ ## Stop vs fricative **Greater effect with fricatives than with stops** - House & Fairbanks (1953), Laeufer (1992), Zimmerman & Sapon (1958). **Greater effect with stops than with fricatives** - Tanner et al. (2019). ] -- .pull-right[ ## Stop vs sonorant **Nasals exercise an intermediate effect** between that of voiceless and voiced stops but closer to that of the latter - House & Fairbanks (1953), Zimmerman & Sapon (1958). **Vowels are longer when followed by nasals than when followed by voiced stops** - Peterson & Lehiste (1960). **Vowels have the same duration** when followed by nasals and voiced stops. - Lisker (1974). ] --- # Contextual effects (in English) **Narrow focus increases the effect of voicing in English but not in Arabic** - de Jong 2004. - de Jong & Zawaydeh 2002. **The ratio of vowel-to-consonant duration is the same across speaking rates** - Port & Dalby 1982. -- ## BUT... **Vowel duration is a more robust cue than vowel-to-consonant ratio** - Luce & Charles-Luce 1985. **The ratio of vowel-to-consonant duration DOES change across speaking rates** - Ko 2018. --- # Contextual effects (in English) - Greater effect in **pre-pausal** words (Umeda 1975). - Greater effect in **stressed vowels** (Davis & Summers 1989). - Greater effect in **word-final syllables** (Abdelli-Beruh 2004). - Greater effect in word-initial syllables along the hierarchy **trisyllabic > disyllabic > monosyllabic** (Port 1981). - Greater effect in **lower vowels** (Laeufer 1992). -- <br> .f2[These context share greater intrinsic vowel duration.] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # Myths <br> .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 1**. The voicing effect is a very common phenomenon. ] .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 2**. Polish and Czech do not show a voicing effect. ] .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 3**. The magnitude of the voicing effect in English is greater than that of other languages. ] .bg-washed-yellow.b--yellow.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Myth 4**. The voicing effect is modulated by phonological contexts in systematic ways. ] <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- class: center middle inverse # .small-caps[(attempted) meta-analysis] ??? 13 studies. 17 effect estimates (13 word-final, 4 non-word-final). --- class: center middle ![:scale 80%](img/ve-en-shrink.png) --- class: center middle ![:scale 80%](img/ve-en-marginal.png) <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> <!-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --> --- # HIC SVNT LEONES <br> .bg-washed-red.b--dark-red.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **HIGHEST PRIORITY**. Investigation of **un(der)-studied and un(der)-represented** languages. ] -- .bg-washed-blue.b--dark-blue.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Direct comparison** in cross-linguistic studies. ] -- .bg-washed-blue.b--dark-blue.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Replication** of prior studies with more appropriate sample sizes. ] -- .bg-washed-blue.b--dark-blue.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt3[ **Share data and materials** (experimental materials, statistical analysis code, etc). ] --- class: center middle inverse ![:scale 40%](img/thanks.jpg) --- class: middle inverse # References can be found here: ## https://stefanocoretta.github.io/biblio/